Recent legal developments show how governments are rethinking animal protection. The UK is strengthening welfare rules for crustaceans, prompting retailers to adopt more humane slaughter methods, while Mexico City has passed a law banning bullfights that harm or kill animals. In contrast, the EU has voted to reduce legal protections for wolves, highlighting tensions between conservation goals and agricultural interests. Together, these cases show that animal-related laws are shifting, but not always in the same direction.
These articles show that animal law is evolving, but in uneven ways. While some countries are expanding protections by recognizing animal suffering and limiting harmful practices, others are weakening conservation rules under political or economic pressure. This contrast suggests that global progress in animal welfare is real but still inconsistent and highly dependent on social and political priorities.
1. Co-op and prawn welfare(Financial Times)
Bentham, M. (2025, January 19). Co-op to stop selling suffocated prawns following welfare outcry. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/8f19519e-9f3b-4b03-
2. EU wolf protection vote(AP News)
Lawless, J. (2025, May 8). European Parliament votes to lower protections on wolves. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/3e0b269e283facd6c292b94985484f1a
3. Mexico City bullfight ban(People Magazine)
Lenthang, M. (2025, January 31). Mexico City votes to ban “violent” bullfight events that harm or kill animals. People. https://people.com/mexico-city-votes-to-ban-violent-bullfights-11699819


