In the world, there are many kinds of laws related to animal because of their religion, welfare, ethics and the protection of ecosystems and environment. This time, I am going to introduce some laws I found.
In India, it is prohibited to kill cows and sell beef except some states. It is because Hindus recognize cow as sacred animals, and they think people should not kill them. This kinds of law exists in Nepal and poke can not be treated in Islamic states. Also, there are some countries protecting animals excessively. In Switzerland, it is banned to have a guinea pig and a parakeet as a pet. It is said that they are social animals, so having one means isolation from their society and recognize as abuse. Moreover, the constitution defines animals are lifely existence and prohibit to give painful discipline for them. As a concrete example, it is illegal to cut dogs’ tails and ears.
I thought those things were defined as their religion but I found those rules were established as official laws. Though I can’t understand why they believe those things, it is also the fact that there are many believers in the world and those law are kinds of their protection to keep following their beliefs. I also surprises at the law in German because I have a German dog, which their official name is Miniature Pinscher, and her ears and tail were cut. I had heard that they are cut their ears and tails because they were working as rat catchers and needed to do that. Learning those things I mentioned before, I feel Japan is unfamiliar with animal protections and so on, of course it is not illegal or unethical.
Pork in Pakistan. (n.d.). Wikipedia. Retrieved December 18, 2025, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pork_in_Pakistan
Cattle slaughter in India. (n.d.). Wikipedia. Retrieved December 18, 2025, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cattle_slaughter_in_India
Poole, J. (2025, July 2). Swiss government mandates transparency for animal suffering in animal product labeling. Food Ingredients First. Retrieved from https://www.foodingredientsfirst.com/news/switzerland-animal-welfare-labeling-law-food
Docking ban. (n.d.). Deutscher Tierschutzbund e.V. Retrieved December 18, 2025, from https://www.tierschutzbund.de/en/animals-topics/pets/dogs/docking-ban
ジェトロ. (2025, October 27). ディスカウントスーパー大手アルディ、最低基準の畜産飼育ラベル製品の販売を中止へ. Retrieved from https://www.jetro.go.jp/biznews/2025/10/ebab47c2fad23f0d.html
Your post introduces how animal-related laws vary globally based not only on ethics or ecology but also on cultural beliefs and legal values. You note that in India and Nepal cows are legally protected due to religious reverence, while Switzerland forbids certain pets because of welfare concerns—an insight that challenges the assumption that law is purely rational and universal.
返信削除This juxtaposition made me think of how law reflects dominant social priorities rather than objective standards. For example, in animal welfare law, there are global tensions between economic interests and protection measures: some regions strengthen animal protections while others reduce them due to political pressures or agricultural interests. I also reflected on Japanese animal-welfare norms, which you mention feel “unfamiliar.” This opened a question in my mind: to what degree should legal norms impose ethical obligations on individuals when cultural beliefs differ so widely?
Your conclusion that Japan’s legal and ethical framework feels distant suggests a broader issue about legal pluralism and global consensus. What specific reforms would you suggest to Japan to align its welfare law with the more stringent protections you find interesting, and why?